EVGA 151-HE-E999

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	EVGA 151-HE-E999 (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141014
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	May 21 '16 at 00:38
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 78 1-Core 104 2-Core 202 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 698 67% 554 Pts	64-Core 849 53% 849 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4998) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6519 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Lighting 115 Reflection 119 Parallax 107 94% 114 fps	MRender 98 Gravity 102 Splatting 95.3 80% 98.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 354GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1535 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 465 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 60 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 26 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1709155578	96.2% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 407 Mixed 418 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 69.8 4K Mixed 41.8 146% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 35 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 19.6 47% 91.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 345GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2590 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 510 (B1) Unknown 97 97 50 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 51 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 58 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15479817023	82.1% Excellent	Read 506 Write 399 Mixed 415 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 22.1 119% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 35.3 DQ Write 69.9 DQ Mixed 19.8 24% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 839GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 129241976 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 901 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 11319145 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2546 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 513 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 63 420675609 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 55 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4249 (C2) HDA temperature 25 40 60129542169 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 42829413876683 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1208042241 (F2) Unknown 100 253 18629686925	94.5% Outstanding	Read 151 Write 179 Mixed 149 120% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.21 92% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.1% Good	MC Read 28 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 20.9 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 16.5 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 84.2 48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 151-HE-E999 Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 77%

Battleship

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 69%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: EVGA 151-HE-E999

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	33x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	28x
Xeon E5-2667 v3IntelBench 77%, 531 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	11x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	11x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	11x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 182%, 10,890 samples	10x
PC SN750 WDS250G1B0E-00B3V0 250GBWDCBench 193%, 31 samples	8x

RAM
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 32GBMicronBench 99%, 7 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	5x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $523

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16