HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176C
Memory	21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180730
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '18 at 04:27
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 72.2 2-Core 144 59% 98.4 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 364 40% 317 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 8% HP(103C 176C) 2GB CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.63 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	6.72% Terrible	Lighting 7.3 Reflection 6.85 Parallax 8.94 6% 7.69 fps	MRender 10.1 Gravity 8.7 Splatting 11 8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.72% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$85 16,039 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 581GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 340 343 338 332 338 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	68% Good	Read 349 Write 331 Mixed 194 SusWrite 341 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 29.2 98% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 31.9 DQ Write 93.4 DQ Mixed 42.7 38% 56 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 121%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 570GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 85 97 93 94 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 34.5 Write 86.3 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 89.2 49% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.8% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.7 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 13.4 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	99x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	92x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	82x

GPU
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	296x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	95x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	25x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	34x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	14x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	13x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	20x
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	11x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 53%, 361 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16