Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '18 at 00:22
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131 70,038 User benchmarks, average bench 66% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 77.3 1-Core 111 2-Core 220 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 532 54% 439 Pts	64-Core 585 36% 585 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.16 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	35.2% Below average	Lighting 42.2 Reflection 39.3 Parallax 52.1 34% 44.5 fps	MRender 53.8 Gravity 49 Splatting 35.6 37% 46.1 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 473 381 300 299 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 466 Mixed 443 SusWrite 371 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 45.4 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 59.6 201% 70.2 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 364 274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 128%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 19GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 66.7 Write 32.5 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 42.4 36% 48.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 60%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 30GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 74 74 74 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 62.7 Write 67 Mixed 31.3 SusWrite 72.5 43% 58.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 342GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 121 115 122 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 127 Write 118 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 119 71% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 107%
Silicon Power Blaze B10 USB 3.0 16GB-$20 185 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 7GB free, PID 0916 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 40.7 Write 20.7 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 20.5 27% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47 29,751 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	MC Read 38.4 MC Write 36.6 MC Mixed 32 102% 35.7 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 35.8 SC Mixed 26.9 81% 28.2 GB/s	Latency 85.7 47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)