Supermicro X8DTL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemSupermicro X8DTL  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8DTL
Memory19.1 GB free of 24.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '18 at 23:36
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5520
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
33% Below average
SC Int 35.9
SC Float 38.6
SC Mixed 38
26% 37.5 Pts
QC Int 182
QC Float 205
QC Mixed 213
36% 200 Pts
MC Int 511
MC Float 552
MC Mixed 533
36% 532 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$150
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Lighting 87.9
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 120
31% 93.5 fps
MRender 80
Gravity 112
Splatting 78.6
39% 90.1 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 42%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Re 1TB (2013)-$70
826GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01V03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 30 9 20 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 92.5
Write 16
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 43.8
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 78%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$85
5GB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 133
Write 136
Mixed 71.3
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 96%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$85
3GB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 72.5
Write 72.8
Mixed 48.8
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 96%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 154 156 156 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 162
Write 156
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 152
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N ATMEL 26DF321 60GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 33 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.3% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical X8DTL Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

System: Supermicro X8DTL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $170
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $250Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback