Supermicro X8DTL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro X8DTL  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8DTL
Memory19.1 GB free of 24.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '18 at 23:36
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5520
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 38
2-Core 86.3
44% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 348
36% 281 Pts
64-Core 533
36% 533 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$150
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 87.9
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 120
23% 93.5 fps
MRender 80
Gravity 112
Splatting 78.6
31% 90.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Re 1TB (2013)-$60
826GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01V03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 30 9 20 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 92.5
Write 16
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 43.8
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 78%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$80
5GB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 133
Write 136
Mixed 71.3
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 96%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$80
3GB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 72.5
Write 72.8
Mixed 48.8
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 96%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$80
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 154 156 156 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 162
Write 156
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 152
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N ATMEL 26DF321 60GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 33 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.3% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X8DTL Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X8DTL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $260
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $192Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $151Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $335Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback