Foxconn A9DA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardFoxconn A9DA  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '18 at 19:18
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket 938, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 112
56% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 218
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Lighting 26.5
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 35.8
22% 31 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 33.2
24% 28.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DEMN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 17 17 23 64 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 68.6
Write 93.8
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 38
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 64%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB
25GB free, PID 0095
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 14 15 19 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.73% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 23.7
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 14.9
28% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
31% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.73%
Great: 36%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB
58GB free, PID 00ad
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 9.6 9.7 13 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 17.1
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 10.6
21% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
84% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 33%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
109GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 9.2 9.5 8.8 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 17.7
Write 16.1
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 9.7
19% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.7
119% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10%
Great: 36%
Corsair Flash Voyager USB 3.0 32GB-$88
26GB free, PID 1a03
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 9.8 9.6 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.77% Terrible
Read 25.7
Write 24.4
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 11.1
21% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.6% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A9DA Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A9DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $175
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback