Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '18 at 18:25
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 148
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 245
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.8% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 62.1
47% 61.3 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 55
Splatting 49.2
46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 418
Write 261
Mixed 286
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 28.5
98% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 152
137% 208 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 91%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
9GB free
Firmware: 525ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 61 60 58 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 89.3
Write 96.3
Mixed 108
SusWrite 60.4
20% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 28.2
95% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 95.5
DQ Mixed 87.9
71% 101 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 73%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
13GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 105 110 114 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 94
Write 90.2
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 106
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
29GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 110 113 112 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 105
Write 107
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 109
73% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 84%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
775GB free
Firmware: 01.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 138 149 149 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 108
Write 99
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 145
68% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
2GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 81.7
Mixed 66
104% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 14.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback