Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 110 2-Core 217 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 408 51% 390 Pts	64-Core 567 35% 567 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Zotac(19DA 2227) 1GB CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 17.5 Reflection 20.3 Parallax 18.1 14% 18.6 fps	MRender 24.7 Gravity 17.8 Splatting 15 15% 19.1 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 18%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50 12,013 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 93.2 Write 46.5 Mixed 58.8 50% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. 1315 BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. 1315 CT102464BA1339.C16 1315 CT102464BA1339.C16 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.7% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 11.3 36% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 12.6 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Jet ski

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	24x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	22x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	16x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $450

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16