| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M740 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3348-A1 |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151208 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 08 '18 at 16:37 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | AUT-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
74.3%
Very good
|
74% 131 Pts
|
56% 445 Pts
|
34% 547 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
144%
Outstanding
|
154% 205 fps
|
155% 197 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK256MBFZ 256GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 288 291 218 182 197 MB/s
|
73.3%
Very good
|
74% 329 MB/s
|
104% 37.9 MB/s
|
140% 210 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
128GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 58 59 64 61 MB/s
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
19% 26.6 MB/s
|
47% 0.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
65.1%
Good
|
67% 23.4 GB/s
|
52% 18 GB/s
|
52% 77 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS M740 Builds (Compare 75 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M740
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 22x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 12x |
| Xeon E5-1620 v4IntelBench 77%, 3,243 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 13x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 12x |
| Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |