| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | Toshiba SATELLITE R840 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA Portable PC |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs, , |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110628 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 07 '18 at 14:42 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
| CPU Throttled | 60% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
Socket rPGA988B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
|
42.8%
Average
|
38% 57.1 Pts
|
12% 89.3 Pts
|
6% 89.8 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 7400M
Toshiba(1179 0004) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1701.0
|
1.08%
Terrible
|
1% 1.03 fps
|
2% 1.79 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ct240bx3 0 240GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR
|
35% 157 MB/s
|
68% 23.9 MB/s
|
143% 197 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
13GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 13 13 13 MB/s
|
12.4%
Very poor
|
22% 17.5 MB/s
|
143% 2.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
|
38.8%
Below average
|
40% 14.2 GB/s
|
23% 8.17 GB/s
|
40% 99.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds