Koloe X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardKoloe X58  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '18 at 14:04
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5645
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 58.8
2-Core 118
57% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 360
36% 293 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.9% Average
Lighting 50.4
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 75.2
41% 60.6 fps
MRender 55.2
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 70.8
49% 58.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 158 162 163 155 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.9% Average
Read 221
Write 153
Mixed 146
SusWrite 154
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 22.3
81% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 52.8
DQ Mixed 27.2
24% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
99GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 92 88 87 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 110
Write 112
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 89.6
68% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 70%
WD Elements 1TB
375GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 23 24 23 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 26
Write 23.3
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 22.5
31% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 MXIC 25L8005 37GB
1333, 33 MHz
4096, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 12.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback