Asus Maximus Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Maximus Extreme  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '18 at 01:10
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 34.9
2-Core 69.1
38% 57 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 137
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
EVGA(3842 1587) 1.5GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 1012 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
25% Poor
Lighting 29.3
Reflection 44.7
Parallax 32.7
24% 35.5 fps
MRender 44.1
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 33.1
27% 33.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 221 224 227 227 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
73.3% Very good
Read 256
Write 246
Mixed 244
SusWrite 224
55% 242 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 40.4
132% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 181
137% 183 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 129%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
616GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
45% Average
Read 69.5
Write 99.8
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 86.6
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45%
Great: 60%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
931GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 97
Write 83
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 107
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.4 6.3 5.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 6
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 6.2
8% 7.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.4
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus Extreme Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Maximus Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $253
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback