HP 700-230qe

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-230qe  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '18 at 22:28
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 206
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 574
55% 455 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 41.9
32% 37.7 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 36.5
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
728GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 418 463 458 466 466 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 468
Mixed 444
SusWrite 454
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 48.5
159% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 348
259% 344 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 102 99 100 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 131
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 100
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 89%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
958GB free
Firmware: 0740
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 22
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 13.2
17% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 97%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
556GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 20.2
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 11.9
27% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 59%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
1TB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.48% Terrible
Read 30.5
Write 21
Mixed 14
SusWrite 12.2
24% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.48%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698651-154-KEB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.1
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-230qe Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-230qe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $205
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback