PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20111207 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 06 '18 at 18:34 |
Run Duration | 248 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8120
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
|
68.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.89
|
31.4%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 254 266 271 265 272 MB/s
|
68.8%
Good
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
123GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 78 80 84 125 MB/s
|
60.7%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 31 31 31 30 MB/s
|
19.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Desktop 2TB
108GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
8.54%
Terrible
|
|||
SAMSUNG HM250HI 250GB
55GB free, PID 047a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 32 32 31 31 MB/s
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
677GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
50.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 29x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 18x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 11x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 9x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |