Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 132% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180917
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '18 at 14:26
Run Duration	367 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 75.3 1-Core 117 2-Core 228 77% 140 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 910 80% 682 Pts	64-Core 2,327 144% 2,327 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Zotac(19DA 1503); ZOTAC GAMING RTX 2080 Ti AMP CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.16 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	130% Outstanding	Lighting 154 Reflection 208 Parallax 231 126% 198 fps	MRender 252 Gravity 216 Splatting 143 160% 204 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1321 1811 1882 1974 2138 2140 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	296% Outstanding	Read 2,525 Write 1,985 Mixed 1,405 SusWrite 1,878 436% 1,948 MB/s	4K Read 48.2 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 61.1 199% 66.4 MB/s	DQ Read 476 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 398 299% 403 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 296% Great: 425%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 754GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1236 1197 1195 1194 1194 1191 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 1,939 Write 1,770 Mixed 1,016 SusWrite 1,201 332% 1,482 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 93.1 4K Mixed 54 176% 61.7 MB/s	DQ Read 487 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 415 311% 418 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 668GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 472 473 473 473 473 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 466 Mixed 399 SusWrite 472 103% 459 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 40.1 134% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 364 269% 355 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1TB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 127 128 128 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 145 Write 135 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 127 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 92%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 751GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 115 116 116 116 114 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 148 Write 111 Mixed 76 SusWrite 114 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 96%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 623GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 130 129 130 129 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	71% Very good	Read 119 Write 112 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 128 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 508GB free Firmware: MJAOA3B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 146 138 137 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Read 151 Write 142 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 139 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 91%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: MJAOA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 156 158 158 162 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 161 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 158 95% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 91%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 682GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 144 149 148 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 83.8 Write 85.3 Mixed 67 SusWrite 147 70% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 117 118 117 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 128 Write 115 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 117 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 8,912 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	MC Read 72.4 MC Write 76.8 MC Mixed 65.3 204% 71.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 43.2 SC Mixed 30.2 90% 31.4 GB/s	Latency 89.7 45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	144x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	42x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	49x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples	7x
CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GBCorsairBench 97%, 731 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $981

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16