Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics69% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '18 at 18:37
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
SC Int 108
SC Float 118
SC Mixed 109
89% 112 Pts
QC Int 395
QC Float 470
QC Mixed 445
99% 437 Pts
MC Int 1,207
MC Float 1259
MC Mixed 1,249
185% 1,238 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$280
CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69% Good
Lighting 202
Reflection 181
Parallax 272
70% 219 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 194
Splatting 131
68% 157 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 7,545
Write 4,634
Mixed 5,558
1,309% 5,912 MB/s
4K Read 371
4K Write 255
4K Mixed 253
1,021% 293 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 797
DQ Mixed 223
258% 425 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 123%
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$108
96GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 227 217 216 232 225 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 302
Write 328
Mixed 328
SusWrite 231
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 24.8
81% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 82.6
DQ Mixed 82.6
65% 91.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$54
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 112 117 110 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 101
Write 70
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 114
66% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 75%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 16GB-$15
15GB free, PID 168e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 32 31 32 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 63.8
Write 29.8
Mixed 17
SusWrite 31
42% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
48% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19%
Great: 40%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 16GB-$15
15GB free, PID 168e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 32 31 32 32 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 63.8
Write 25.8
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 31
41% 35 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 40%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.8 4 3.6 4 2 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 3.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3.3
6% 5.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 7%
 8GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.4 5 4.6 4.3 5.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Read 25.7
Write 4
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 4.9
10% 10 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$140
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 32.2
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 26.4
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 12,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $146

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $1,028
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback