bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
System
MotherboardIntel DX58SO
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 05 '18 at 14:07
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7 930-$100
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
46.5% Average
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 156
56% 118 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 325
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 335
22% 335 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB; GV-N105TOC-4GD
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Lighting 114
Reflection 78.1
Parallax 119
30% 104 fps
MRender 80.1
Gravity 113
Splatting 81.7
31% 91.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$70
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 3,674
Write 1,971
Mixed 2,426
594% 2,690 MB/s
4K Read 237
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 62.5
498% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 414
277% 324 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 130%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$50
463GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 80 92 93 93 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 37.2
Write 58.3
SusWrite 83.4
43% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$33
277GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 82 93 93 93 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
41% Average
Read 56.7
Write 91.4
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 85.8
55% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41%
Great: 69%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
607GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 24.8
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 26.1
35% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
23.1% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 5.8
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical bin Builds (Compare 46,782 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $467
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback