| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 76.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Dell Studio XPS 8000 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0X231R |
| Memory | 4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090811 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 05 '18 at 06:05 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.2%
Very good
|
65% 107 Pts
|
40% 312 Pts
|
23% 365 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
76.2%
Very good
|
66% 113 fps
|
97% 118 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OCZ OCTANE 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E0882540
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 106 69 45 41 MB/s
|
27.6%
Poor
|
30% 133 MB/s
|
47% 15.7 MB/s
|
12% 19.4 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$28
102GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 46 46 47 47 MB/s
|
31.8%
Below average
|
39% 52.4 MB/s
|
180% 1.2 MB/s
| |
|
ST310005 28AS 1TB
413GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
|
14.1%
Very poor
|
34% 25.5 MB/s
|
78% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.2%
Poor
|
21% 7.33 GB/s
|
24% 8.37 GB/s
|
62% 64.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 8000 Builds (Compare 187 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Studio XPS 8000
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 118x |
| Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 51x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 21x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $394 |