Asus X550JK

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus X550JK (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X550JK
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141008
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '18 at 22:46
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710HQ 69,536 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 95.1 2-Core 190 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 521 56% 445 Pts	64-Core 521 32% 521 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M 13,931 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 178D) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1616 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 20.5 Reflection 15.8 Parallax 16.8 17% 17.7 fps	MRender 12.4 Gravity 20.6 Splatting 15.6 13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 447 432 427 362 306 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	99.3% Outstanding	Read 429 Write 423 Mixed 350 SusWrite 393 90% 399 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 39.2 136% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 255 220% 324 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 113%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 117 115 116 116 117 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 114 Write 82.4 Mixed 58.1 SusWrite 115 68% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB 8,778 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 11GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 5 5.2 5.8 6 6 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	6.94% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 13.9 Mixed 10 SusWrite 5.3 15% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.9 100% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.94% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB 2,847 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 16.4 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 17 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X550JK Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JK

CPU
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	282x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	281x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	387x
GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples	177x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	40x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,847 samples	38x
EDJ4208EFBG-GNL-F Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GBElpidaBench 52%, 268 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $52

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16