Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 80.6 1-Core 61.7 2-Core 112 54% 84.7 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 251 29% 228 Pts	64-Core 266 16% 266 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM871b 2.5 7mm 256GB 1,320 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT02D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 305 305 308 307 305 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 424 Write 307 Mixed 254 SusWrite 312 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 29.6 100% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 195 164% 238 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 114%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.2 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	2.47% Terrible	Read 9.1 Write 3 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 4.5 7% 5.48 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.47% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.3% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 8 24% 8.43 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16