| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus M4A87TD EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100519 |
| Uptime | 8 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 04 '18 at 12:36 |
| Run Duration | 106 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.7%
Good
|
54% 82 Pts
|
32% 254 Pts
|
19% 305 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.70
|
31.9%
Below average
|
32% 36.2 fps
|
31% 38.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 123 136 138 139 136 MB/s
|
22.8%
Poor
|
36% 159 MB/s
|
21% 6.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.1%
Below average
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
20% 7.1 GB/s
|
60% 66.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 36x |
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 25x |
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 6x |
| HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $241 |