Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics88.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory18.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateOct 04 '18 at 01:59
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 72
2-Core 142
60% 99 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 318
36% 284 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Gigabyte(1458 370E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.4% Excellent
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 147
Parallax 149
80% 131 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 149
Splatting 117
104% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 480GB-$300
63GB free
Firmware: OC34L5TP Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 600
Write 833
Mixed 250
125% 561 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 11.7
58% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 463
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 109
152% 284 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 181%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
398GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 287 297 199 139 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 139
Write 386
Mixed 262
SusWrite 212
57% 250 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 14.2
71% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 254
213% 310 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
354GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 286 296 197 237 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 433
Write 282
Mixed 350
SusWrite 232
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 29.8
95% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 327
246% 331 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 76%
Great: 131%
Intel SSDPEDMW012T4 1TB
51GB free
Firmware: 8EV101H0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 733 857 881 606 691 424 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 464
Mixed 367
SusWrite 699
116% 513 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 23.3
77% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 902
DQ Write 608
DQ Mixed 679
528% 730 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 121%
Great: 250%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 641 578 669 750 709 1002 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,659
Write 421
Mixed 526
SusWrite 725
183% 833 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 17.4
74% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 903
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 550
425% 597 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 160%
Great: 363%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 152 153 151 141 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 122
Write 148
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 144
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
213% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 32 19 54 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 47.5
Write 91
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 44.7
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.3
134% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 66%
Kingston DT Micro 8GB
7GB free, PID 168a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 5.2 2.9 3.2 2.9 2.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
4.81% Terrible
Read 20
Write 12
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 4.2
15% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.81%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 38.7
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.3
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $864
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback