Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2807 814 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	28.2% Poor	Memory 51.4 1-Core 20.3 2-Core 28 25% 33.2 Pts	4-Core 31 8-Core 34.8 4% 32.9 Pts	64-Core 34.1 2% 34.1 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.8% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.84 1% 0.89 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.48 1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.8% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSC180S3764GJ 64GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 49 33 35 35 35 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.4% Average	Read 242 Write 207 Mixed 200 SusWrite 58.2 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 20.6 81% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 95.9 DQ Mixed 102 76% 101 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 72%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 0GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 18.6 Write 5.7 Mixed 7.5 11% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 16% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AD3SSW4GB1WB-CKGEL 1x4GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 5.1 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 2.6 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16