Sony SVE15117FKP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSony SVE15117FKP  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '18 at 10:40
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 132
62% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 188
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7650M
Sony(104D 90AC) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.933.0.0
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
4.53% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 5.62
Parallax 4.47
5% 5.26 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 4.03
Splatting 6
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5076GSX 500GB-$54
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 32 40 36 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 40.3
Write 37.1
Mixed 19
SusWrite 31.4
23% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19N Samsung M471B5173BH0-CH9 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback