Dell Studio XPS 8000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Studio XPS 8000  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X231R
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090811
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 02 '18 at 23:11
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70% Good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 152
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 273
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.12
Parallax 4.06
3% 4.05 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 6.04
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721064SLA360 640GB-$135
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STDOA38E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 50 42 55 56 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 87
Write 81.3
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 52.6
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
910GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 171 170 174 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 169
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 171
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
466GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 20.6
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 18.6
29% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 21%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 320GB
128GB free, PID 2120
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 19 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.93% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 19.7
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 18.1
27% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.93%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8000 Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 8000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $393
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback