Asus H110M-R

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-R (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160526
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 02 '18 at 22:10
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$132 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 63.8 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 163 61% 107 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 258 44% 308 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.5% Above average	Lighting 67.6 Reflection 68 Parallax 57.8 55% 64.5 fps	MRender 62.9 Gravity 58.5 Splatting 62.5 50% 61.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 260GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 245 133 172 122 111 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 424 Write 405 Mixed 339 SusWrite 180 76% 337 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 72.6 4K Mixed 34.9 124% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 136 120% 185 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 288GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 83 87 92 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 132 Write 127 Mixed 90.8 SusWrite 89.7 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 206% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB 49,673 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	54% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 19.2 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 15.4 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	923x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	374x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	273x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	523x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	340x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	304x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	246x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	144x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	120x

RAM
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	114x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	94x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	40x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16