PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 63.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20111117 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Oct 02 '18 at 18:59 |
Run Duration | 181 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
59.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6262) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
|
63.3%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 250GB-$90
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 187 194 199 192 181 MB/s
|
71.9%
Very good
|
|||
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.2 6.2 7.5 MB/s
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1230 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 13 13 13 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Desktop 500GB
221GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate FreeAgent 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
|
10.6%
Very poor
|
|||
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
2TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.3 6.3 6.2 6.3 6.2 MB/s
|
19.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLT4G3D1869DT1TX0. 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 89x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 54x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 43x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 15x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $783 |