PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock B75M-DGS R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20131001 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 02 '18 at 10:53 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | TWN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
76.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GSO
Asus(1043 828C) 384MB
Ram: 384MB, Driver: 342.1
|
5.08%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ezlink Panzer IV-H 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 152 199 203 242 306 MB/s
|
80.1%
Excellent
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
13GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 15 15 16 16 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNNG 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 34x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 27x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 24x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 22x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 11% - Very poor | Total price: $179 |