Lenovo 20HU0004US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20HU0004US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HU0004US
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180724
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateOct 02 '18 at 01:45
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3450
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 39.9
1-Core 42.5
2-Core 81.6
32% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 154
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 5064) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4785
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 2.12
2% 2.21 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 3.35
2% 2.74 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT24L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 151 130 95 94 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 388
Write 363
Mixed 279
SusWrite 119
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 32.1
105% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 235
167% 214 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback