Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF (all builds)
Memory	24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170711
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '18 at 22:57
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250 5,430 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 73.5 1-Core 121 2-Core 242 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 873 79% 663 Pts	64-Core 1,884 117% 1,884 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.8% Very good	Lighting 90.9 Reflection 99.1 Parallax 104 74% 97.9 fps	MRender 71.8 Gravity 84.6 Splatting 78.6 64% 78.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 93 94 97 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	175% Outstanding	Read 1,684 Write 1,042 Mixed 782 SusWrite 93.2 198% 900 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 59.5 207% 78.8 MB/s	DQ Read 964 DQ Write 743 DQ Mixed 811 618% 839 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 457GB free Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 81 84 85 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,586 Write 991 Mixed 726 SusWrite 83.9 186% 847 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 52.8 185% 69.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,092 DQ Write 864 DQ Mixed 909 699% 955 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 353%
WDC WD60 02FRYZ-01WD5B0 6TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 3TB free, PID 2773 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 61 61 62 62 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.3% Average	Read 166 Write 136 Mixed 70.7 SusWrite 60.9 135% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 84%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 32GB-$102 362 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 2GB free, PID 168e SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 24 28 25 25 20 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 69.7 Write 28.5 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 25.1 46% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 67% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	80.5% Excellent	MC Read 27 MC Write 43 MC Mixed 25.7 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 8.9 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 93.4 43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	38x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	22x
Core i9-7940XIntel $815Bench 83%, 4,560 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	12x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	9x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 12,020 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	8x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	5x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	17x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $775

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)