Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 54 2-Core 92.4 43% 68.7 Pts	4-Core 86.2 8-Core 91 12% 88.6 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1439) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.62 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.3 1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 184 Write 178 Mixed 183 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 23.3 4K Mixed 18.8 60% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 137 114% 163 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 97%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 17GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 19.3 Write 12.2 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 13.6 20% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.2 129% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3020EF48E8W1333 2x2GB 858 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 7.4 16% 5.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 0.7 SC Mixed 1.4 4% 1.43 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples	20x
Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples	10x
Pentium T4500IntelBench 34%, 8,800 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 5400ATIBench 1%, 10,400 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	14x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	5x

SSD
GOODRAM 120GBBench 68%, 5,433 samples	1x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples	8x
AD73I1B1674EG 2x2GBAdataBench 24%, 184 samples	3x
HP594908-HR1-ELD 2x2GBKingstonBench 24%, 207 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16