| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150626 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 30 '18 at 20:04 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.8%
Above average
|
52% 85.4 Pts
|
35% 285 Pts
|
22% 364 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB; asus nvidia gtx 1050 ti
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
10.4%
Very poor
|
0% 9.86 fps
|
30% 37.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 91 93 106 107 92 MB/s
|
67.3%
Good
|
72% 99.6 MB/s
|
134% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
552GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 111 114 113 115 MB/s
|
68.1%
Good
|
77% 106 MB/s
|
174% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.1%
Poor
|
21% 7.33 GB/s
|
19% 6.7 GB/s
|
46% 87.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,817 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 865x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 645x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 438x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 186x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 160x |
| RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 118x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $358 |