Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '18 at 09:53
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 63.5 1-Core 135 2-Core 272 82% 157 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 789 79% 645 Pts	64-Core 971 60% 971 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6291 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.46% Terrible	Lighting 7.87 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 5.38 6% 7.95 fps	MRender 8.33 Gravity 6.07 Splatting 9.17 6% 7.86 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.46% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 440GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 422 299 282 288 292 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 438 Write 409 Mixed 399 SusWrite 338 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 87.1 4K Mixed 46.6 157% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 354 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 464GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 400 406 352 316 267 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 422 Write 421 Mixed 396 SusWrite 360 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 84.3 4K Mixed 37 140% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 333 250% 335 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 129%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 28GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 38 39 38 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 37 Write 36.7 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 38.4 49% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D34AEEAK.K8FB 2x8GB 546 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 15 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 10.8 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	537x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	499x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	427x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	563x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	511x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	473x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $979

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16