Zoostorm 9876-1336A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemZoostorm 9876-1336A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK B85M-G
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '18 at 06:57
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$305
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 106
2-Core 216
81% 138 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 574
58% 461 Pts
64-Core 574
38% 574 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
8.98% Terrible
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 33.5
7% 27.7 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 28
9% 28.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.98%
Great: 9%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$38
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 63 61 98 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 119
Write 117
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 77.9
71% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial ST102464BA160B.16F 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.5
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $335Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback