Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 29 '18 at 22:39
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 177
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 349
42% 322 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 65.8
52% 66 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 53.3
49% 61.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300 256GB-$99
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3310000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 226 237 209 188 235 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 438
Write 310
Mixed 254
SusWrite 221
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 30.3
107% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 200
178% 270 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 97%
Hitachi HTS545016B9A300 160GB-$30
90GB free
Firmware: PBBOC64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 3.4 4.2 3.9 4.2 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 4.2
3% 3.88 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 34%
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
114GB free
Firmware: HH100-14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 25 23 24 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 55.3
Write 38.8
Mixed 31
SusWrite 23
27% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 36%
Toshiba MK8046GSX 80GB
74GB free
Firmware: LB313D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 13 13 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 44
Write 13
Mixed 18
SusWrite 12.3
16% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 27%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA380 320GB
55GB free
Firmware: ST2OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 59 60 60 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 64.2
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 59.6
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 58%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
796GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 111 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 168
Write 125
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 109
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback