Acer Aspire 5220

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemAcer Aspire 5220  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Fuquene
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080506
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateSep 29 '18 at 21:39
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Sempron 3600+
Socket A, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
1-Core 3.7
2-Core 20.3
5% 12 Pts
4-Core 23.2
8-Core 28.8
3% 26 Pts
64-Core 14.9
1% 14.9 Pts
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 13%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1637GSX 160GB-$27
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DL050J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 18 22 16 24 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.94% Terrible
Read 11
Write 8.8
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 19.9
9% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 24%
Kingston DataTraveler 112 16GB
14GB free, PID 162a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.1 3.5 3.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Read 6
Write 2
Mixed 1.3
SusWrite 3.2
4% 3.12 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.7
9% 3.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 0.9
6% 2.17 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 22%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback