| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A75M-DGS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130503 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 29 '18 at 20:26 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.3%
Above average
|
54% 81.2 Pts
|
18% 136 Pts
|
8% 137 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
4.66%
Terrible
|
4% 6.05 fps
|
5% 6.18 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 346 340 359 370 356 MB/s
|
85.1%
Excellent
|
81% 359 MB/s
|
129% 45.7 MB/s
|
135% 184 MB/s
|
|
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
813GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 121 131 127 130 133 MB/s
|
75.1%
Very good
|
88% 120 MB/s
|
190% 1.3 MB/s
| |
|
WD Elements 25A3 2TB
266GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 96 98 99 99 MB/s
|
42.5%
Average
|
115% 86 MB/s
|
109% 1.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown F3-2400C11-4GAB 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.5%
Below average
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
24% 8.37 GB/s
|
57% 69.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A75M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 10 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-DGS R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples | 3x |
| A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples | 2x |
| A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 8370DAMDBench 2%, 5,124 samples | 2x |
| GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 1x |
| HD 5870AMDBench 19%, 10,176 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $36 |