| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 6.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160315 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 29 '18 at 17:07 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.2%
Average
|
53% 88.4 Pts
|
22% 174 Pts
|
13% 216 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 04C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.1
|
6.32%
Terrible
|
6% 9.26 fps
|
6% 7.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 115 135 152 141 145 MB/s
|
81.2%
Excellent
|
93% 127 MB/s
|
146% 1 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HDT721064SLA380 640GB
594GB free
Firmware: STDO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 103 101 103 MB/s
|
59.1%
Above average
|
64% 88.2 MB/s
|
160% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2133 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.9%
Poor
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
14% 4.73 GB/s
|
37% 109 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 25 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 4x |
| A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 3x |
| A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 3x |
| Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $144 |