Asrock ConRoe1333-D667

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asrock ConRoe1333-D667 (all builds)
Memory	0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20091118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '18 at 07:22
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$15 11,349 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 23.3 2-Core 41.9 30% 41.7 Pts	4-Core 40.2 8-Core 43.1 6% 41.7 Pts	64-Core 34.9 2% 34.9 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221 10,770 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2320000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 100 85 100 100 90 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.1% Poor	Read 180 Write 160 Mixed 133 SusWrite 93.4 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 5.6 42% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.9 DQ Write 81.1 DQ Mixed 9.6 20% 37.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 652GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 100 96 101 102 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 109 Write 43.3 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 97.1 57% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 67GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 69 71 70 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 93.2 Write 98 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 69.4 58% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 69%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB 2,298 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 784GB free, PID 50a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.98% Terrible	Read 23.3 Write 23.7 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 24 29% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.98% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 2.9 10% 3.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ConRoe1333-D667 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock ConRoe1333-D667

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	4x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	2x
GeForce 8500 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 4,580 samples	2x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	1x

SSD
INTENSO 128GBBench 65%, 3,345 samples	1x
Fury 240GBHyperX $193Bench 71%, 27,826 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	10x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16