Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Dell XPS 8900 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0XJ8C4
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '18 at 00:35
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 124 2-Core 229 82% 145 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 651 65% 529 Pts	64-Core 661 41% 661 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% PNY(196E 11C3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.70 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Lighting 41.2 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 38.4 34% 36.9 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 40.3 Splatting 37 32% 38.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB 17,192 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 578GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 304 317 336 336 335 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 168 Write 99.3 Mixed 282 SusWrite 314 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 14.7 71% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 15.2 DQ Mixed 25.8 34% 66.2 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 485GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 132 138 144 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 122 Write 107 Mixed 68.1 SusWrite 139 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 112%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 5GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 69 69 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 74.6 Write 74.5 Mixed 50 SusWrite 69.1 49% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 101%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 248GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 95 94 96 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 80.1 Write 97.4 Mixed 61.4 SusWrite 94.4 115% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.1 204% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 86%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 141 146 145 139 148 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 144 Write 159 Mixed 111 SusWrite 144 190% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 86%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB 7,384 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 11GB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 67 67 69 68 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 60.6 Write 60.5 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 66.4 82% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 63%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB 7,384 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3.5TB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 107 106 107 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 122 Write 107 Mixed 75.6 SusWrite 106 136% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.7 226% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 63%
WD easystore 25FC 1TB 3,002 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 7GB free, PID 25fc Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 52.2 Write 50.7 Mixed 37 SusWrite 49.9 64% 47.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 01BA 8GBF2X04JEEE36-12-K 01BA 8GBF2X04JEEE36-12-K 32GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2133, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 24.3 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 24.3 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	2,108x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	463x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	170x

GPU
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	507x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	345x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	236x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	71x
L8H-256V2G-11 M.2 2280 256GBLiteonBench 75%, 1,826 samples	65x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	520x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 2x8GBMicronBench 73%, 4,057 samples	223x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 8,407 samples	158x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16