Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '18 at 05:24
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399 38,086 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Memory 94.4 1-Core 150 2-Core 190 87% 145 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 762 66% 563 Pts	64-Core 1101 68% 1101 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 6152) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Lighting 36.4 Reflection 26.8 Parallax 32.7 30% 31.9 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 33.7 Splatting 33.1 28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1966 804 599 611 612 611 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	211% Outstanding	Read 890 Write 1,450 Mixed 933 SusWrite 867 235% 1,035 MB/s	4K Read 55.6 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 72.6 238% 80.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,175 DQ Write 1,018 DQ Mixed 1,101 824% 1,098 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 211% Great: 340%
Transcend TS480GMTS820S 480GB 531 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 447GB free Firmware: R0327B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 403 417 384 387 388 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Read 480 Write 402 Mixed 343 SusWrite 404 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 76.8 4K Mixed 21.4 107% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 33.6 84% 173 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 92%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 103 Write 15.3 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 15.7 42% 41.1 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.3 49% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSTK.8FD 2x8GB 4,186 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	45.5% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 13.1 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 10.3 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 58.7 68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	66x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	64x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	54x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	77x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	65x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	46x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $569

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16