MSI H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A69
MotherboardMSI H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180125
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 28 '18 at 03:07
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 511
68% 510 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 171
Parallax 181
143% 176 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 148
Splatting 107
115% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 337 352 360 360 350 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 501
Write 349
Mixed 233
SusWrite 348
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 14.9
129% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 85.5
107% 186 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
52GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 287 280 277 267 254 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 489
Mixed 405
SusWrite 287
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 65.2
228% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
305GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 435 453 479 476 286 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 490
Mixed 469
SusWrite 424
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 65.2
226% 82.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 133%
Great: 129%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
441GB free
Firmware: PB4OCA1G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 81 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 82.8
Write 78.7
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 80
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 45%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
428GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 156 154 154 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 135
Write 133
Mixed 90
SusWrite 155
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$171
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 23.9
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 21.8
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69) Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $388
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback