HP 870-213w

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP 870-213w (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 82F1
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '18 at 23:51
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 93.7 1-Core 131 2-Core 255 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 682 72% 575 Pts	64-Core 707 44% 707 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.25 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.7% Excellent	Lighting 99.9 Reflection 112 Parallax 95.5 81% 102 fps	MRender 97.6 Gravity 93.9 Splatting 98.9 80% 96.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB 5,580 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 192 185 182 188 184 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 446 Write 408 Mixed 298 SusWrite 194 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 57.9 4K Mixed 35.4 121% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 206 180% 270 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 122%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 379GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 465 482 471 482 481 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 451 Mixed 378 SusWrite 476 101% 448 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 59.1 199% 70.2 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 359 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 337GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 174 174 169 173 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 149 Write 146 Mixed 99.9 SusWrite 172 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 2x8GB 7,552 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	77.6% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 22.3 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 25.4 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870-213w Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: HP 870-213w

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	144x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	3x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	10x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	5x

SSD
SD8SB8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 74%, 4,064 samples	54x
MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 99%, 5,580 samples	18x
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 94%, 17,781 samples	5x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 2x8GBMicronBench 73%, 7,552 samples	117x
HMA851U6AFR6N-UH HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 8GBHynixBench 62%, 19 samples	3x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 1x8GBMicronBench 39%, 259 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16