Gemini NC14V1006

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGemini NC14V1006  (all builds)
MotherboardTo To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180104
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 27 '18 at 15:07
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Memory 40.9
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 94.6
36% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 92
8-Core 93.3
13% 92.7 Pts
64-Core 93
6% 93 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4565
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.28
2% 1.84 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.53
Splatting 3.61
1% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kimtigo 128GB 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 135 34 46 47 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 292
Write 261
Mixed 265
SusWrite 88.1
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 1
17% 6.1 MB/s
DQ Read 86.2
DQ Write 86.1
DQ Mixed 26.5
36% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical NC14V1006 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Gemini NC14V1006

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $192Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback