Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
23 days ago, 23 days ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '18 at 14:24
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62.5% Good
SC Int 90.5
SC Float 90.8
SC Mixed 93.3
73% 91.5 Pts
QC Int 315
QC Float 308
QC Mixed 305
70% 309 Pts
MC Int 385
MC Float 386
MC Mixed 386
58% 385 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 361.91
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 37.6
Parallax 60.1
16% 48.5 fps
MRender 44.9
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 38.9
18% 42.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 19%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 123 130 135 130 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.4% Above average
Read 223
Write 213
Mixed 164
SusWrite 135
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 27.2
89% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 94.2
DQ Mixed 89.1
76% 113 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 118%
Corsair Flash Voyager USB 3.0 16GB-$46
14GB free, PID 1a03
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 19 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 22.8
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 19.7
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
59% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A 3x4GB
3 of 8 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.1% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 27.1
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 81%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $570
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback