Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '18 at 14:24
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 90.8 2-Core 189 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 302 41% 305 Pts	64-Core 386 24% 386 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 361.91 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.9 Reflection 14.5 Parallax 18.8 13% 16.4 fps	MRender 21.4 Gravity 14.3 Splatting 16.9 14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB 2,100 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 123 130 135 130 133 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.4% Above average	Read 223 Write 213 Mixed 164 SusWrite 135 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 27.2 89% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 94.2 DQ Mixed 89.1 76% 113 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 102%
Corsair Flash Voyager USB 3.0 16GB-$46 378 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 14GB free, PID 1a03 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 19 20 20 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 22.8 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 19.7 31% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 59% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A 3x4GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3 of 8 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 33.6 MC Mixed 27.1 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	15x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	11x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	4x
840 250GBSamsungBench 77%, 2,100 samples	4x

RAM
M393B5170EH1- 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 40 samples	9x
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	6x
HMT351U7CFR8A 4x4GBHynixBench 89%, 39 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16