| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 9.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock N68C-S UCC (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100423 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 27 '18 at 14:14 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
45.6%
Average
|
40% 63.9 Pts
|
22% 168 Pts
|
11% 170 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
MSI(1462 8A96) 2GB
CLim: 1172 MHz, MLim: 1417 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.63
|
9.56%
Terrible
|
9% 11.3 fps
|
12% 14 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z331
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 64 70 130 148 132 MB/s
|
25.8%
Poor
|
21% 95.8 MB/s
|
34% 10.1 MB/s
|
20% 34.8 MB/s
|
|
|
35.9%
Below average
|
48% 64.7 MB/s
|
135% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
318GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 102 102 102 102 MB/s
|
59.2%
Above average
|
62% 84.3 MB/s
|
197% 1.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.7%
Poor
|
22% 7.8 GB/s
|
16% 5.53 GB/s
|
33% 120 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 213 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples | 18x |
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 17x |
| Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples | 20x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 9x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |