Brunenit IPMTB-GS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemBrunenit IPMTB-GS  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPMTB-GS
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090312
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateSep 27 '18 at 00:51
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 135
60% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 336
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
Sapphire(174B E140) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 28.8
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 26.6
23% 23.6 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 20
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH1ZABHA 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M504
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 198 197 196 196 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.2% Average
Read 186
Write 201
Mixed 167
SusWrite 195
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 27.4
87% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 81.8
DQ Mixed 34
31% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 15.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback