HP G5403ru

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP G5403ru  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '18 at 11:57
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 73.7
2-Core 122
61% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 206
26% 200 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Device(1B0A 90AA) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.25
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 2.06
2% 2.56 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 2.74
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.22%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 65 37 63 85 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
45% Average
Read 96.2
Write 76.3
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 60.2
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 3GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 10.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback