Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1,736 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 29.8 2-Core 59.1 37% 53.2 Pts	4-Core 58.1 8-Core 58.6 8% 58.3 Pts	64-Core 59.8 4% 59.8 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 3676) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.41% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.42 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.47 fps	MRender 0.38 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 0.57 0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.41% Great: 1%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST320LM000 HM321HI 320GB 1,046 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AJ10003 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 78.5 Write 74.7 Mixed 48.1 50% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 50%
Kingston DataTraveler 112 16GB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 10GB free, PID 162a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 11.5 Write 2 Mixed 1.8 5% 5.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT312S6BFR6C-H9 3GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.5 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 99.5 40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	206x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	91x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	82x

RAM
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 1x4GBMicronBench 27%, 6,018 samples	24x
HP16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 2,690 samples	21x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	20x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16