Biostar X370GT5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar X370GT5 (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180417
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '18 at 11:41
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 70 1-Core 122 2-Core 245 79% 146 Pts	4-Core 473 8-Core 476 64% 475 Pts	64-Core 479 30% 479 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 285 56 57 56 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 272 Mixed 309 SusWrite 149 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 71.8 4K Mixed 46.3 150% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 350 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 134%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 81GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 73 74 73 73 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 93.8 Write 86.2 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 72.8 57% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 58%
Maxtor 6V300F0 300GB 1,297 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 40GB free Firmware: VA111900 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 50 50 50 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 32.3 Write 45.5 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 49.3 29% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.1 144% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 39%
hp v165w 8GB 1,686 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 5307 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 5.2 4.9 4.6 5 4.9 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	4.54% Terrible	Read 14.5 Write 3 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 4.8 7% 6.77 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.54% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.1% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 13.6 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370GT5 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 54%

Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar X370GT5

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	10x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	3x

GPU
RX Vega-56AMD $170Bench 78%, 92,053 samples	4x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	3x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	2x

SSD
CV3-8D128-11 SATA 128GBLiteonBench 67%, 3,445 samples	2x
WDS500G2B0C 500GBWDCBench 193%, 3,120 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 80%, 8,730 samples	3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $280

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16