Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2405S 194 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 82.5 2-Core 137 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 272 36% 271 Pts	64-Core 266 16% 266 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.63 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 38 36% 37.5 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 40.6 Splatting 36.3 31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 293 277 227 191 159 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 466 Mixed 447 SusWrite 241 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 37.6 154% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 240 210% 315 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5471-002.A01LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.8% Below average	MC Read 10 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9.3 28% 9.63 GB/s	Latency 68.3 58% 68.3 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16